http://labnotes.org/2007/08/29/rounded-corners-139-stainrank/ Thu, 18 Mar 2010 02:32:05 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 http://labnotes.org/2007/08/29/rounded-corners-139-stainrank/comment-page-1/#comment-138324 Assaf Thu, 30 Aug 2007 00:11:34 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2007/08/29/rounded-corners-139-stainrank/#comment-138324 But it is a practical option that's relatively popular in the wild, because certain functions could benefit from a $ shortcut. Maybe after consideration it will be rejected for some obvious reason, but I haven't seen a mention of this, nor any of the long-named functions used in the wild. But it is a practical option that’s relatively popular in the wild, because certain functions could benefit from a $ shortcut. Maybe after consideration it will be rejected for some obvious reason, but I haven’t seen a mention of this, nor any of the long-named functions used in the wild.

]]> http://labnotes.org/2007/08/29/rounded-corners-139-stainrank/comment-page-1/#comment-138323 http://simonwillison.net/ Wed, 29 Aug 2007 23:59:23 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2007/08/29/rounded-corners-139-stainrank/#comment-138323 I got the impression that the W3C/WHAT-WG selector work is already being very heavily based on experience gained from Prototype, jQuery and so on. Unfortunately the $ symbol isn't a politically appropriate option :) I got the impression that the W3C/WHAT-WG selector work is already being very heavily based on experience gained from Prototype, jQuery and so on. Unfortunately the $ symbol isn’t a politically appropriate option :)

]]>