1. Jul 2nd, 2007

    Rounded Corners - 123

    My reality is more distorted than yours. Did the FSF just accuse Apple of violating a non-existent license by shipping non-existent software:

    The iPhone is leaving people questioning: Does it contain GPLed software? What impact will the GPLv3 have on the long-term prospects for devices like the iPhone that are built to keep their owners frustrated?

    In theory, there is no difference … Raganwald’s latest take on software project management is another valuable read. It’s too good to pick a single quote, so I’ll just say this. While one of the theories looks closer to reality and a better chance of success, it all boils down to:

    ___ is reality, and you ignore it at your peril.

    I plead ignorance. I never quite thought about it that way. But it is true. And sad. How we learn to ignore science:

    They were, the implication went, ready to put away childish things, ready to go to the theatre and the art gallery, places where there was none of this ‘mad pinball pinging from one hands-on science exhibit to the next, pounding on knobs to make artificial earthquakes’. They had grown out of science.

    Good vs Evil. It might very well be that:

    • Many programmers have used very poor statically typed languages.
    • Many programmers have used dynamically typed languages very poorly.

    A comprehensive look at static and dynamic, at least compared to the flurry of Java-meets-Ruby posts crowding my feed reader. (Via Talk Like a Duck)

    ¿ʇı̣ əsnqɐ ʇ,uɐɔ noʎ ɟı̣ əpoɔı̣un sı̣ pooɓ ʇɐɥʍ

    1. Jul 2nd, 2007

      Chipping the web - bottles — Chip’s Quips

      [...] Interesting questions to consider in the static vs. dynamic typing debate (thanks, Assaf). [...]

    Your comment, here ⇓

    Or using OpenID