<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How will Web Services work with a Web of Services?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 02:39:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sterling Camden</title>
		<link>http://labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/comment-page-1/#comment-137821</link>
		<dc:creator>Sterling Camden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 18:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/#comment-137821</guid>
		<description>Similar to Phillip&#039;s &quot;simple&quot; answer, but different: those that are most atomic.  Use what you need, with no excess baggage or requirements.  Mix and match freely.

But I think you were talking about the underlying technology rather than the structure of the service itself.  In that case, I predict a successor to anything we&#039;ve seen so far -- built on existing technology, but simplifying its usage.  I have no idea how, at the moment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Similar to Phillip&#8217;s &#8220;simple&#8221; answer, but different: those that are most atomic.  Use what you need, with no excess baggage or requirements.  Mix and match freely.</p>
<p>But I think you were talking about the underlying technology rather than the structure of the service itself.  In that case, I predict a successor to anything we&#8217;ve seen so far &#8212; built on existing technology, but simplifying its usage.  I have no idea how, at the moment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phillip Toland</title>
		<link>http://labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/comment-page-1/#comment-137818</link>
		<dc:creator>Phillip Toland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.labnotes.org/2007/04/11/how-will-web-services-work-with-a-web-of-services/#comment-137818</guid>
		<description>The web services that are most likely to mature and survive are the simplest ones. The more complex a service is the more difficult it is to use, particularly as it crosses organizational boundaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The web services that are most likely to mature and survive are the simplest ones. The more complex a service is the more difficult it is to use, particularly as it crosses organizational boundaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
