1. Sep 7th, 2006

    Rounded Corners: yay or nay?

    For most of the year, I’ve been lightblogging from my feed reader using delicious links. It call it lazy blogging. It’s easy enough, so I could share a lot more things with you that don’t justify a full post in their own right.

    A couple of weeks ago I decided to lightblog in a different way. Delicious makes it easy to link to an article, but only one article at a time. Sometimes I want to link two or three articles together. And give credit if the link is coming from someone else. I also tend to overrun their text field quite often, apparently I have a lot to say.

    Or not enough time to be short.

    Anyway, I rolled five short posts into one blog post, called it rounded corners without even thinking about a proper name, and hit publish. And it was so easy, I immediately went on to write the next rounded corners.

    That’s when I decided. Five short posts, minimal editing, once I write the fifth, I publish. Repeat as often as necessary. Or as much interesting stuff as my feed reader can dig up and time allows. Some rounded corners are written in 20 minutes, some take a day or two to fill up. It all depends on number 5.

    Which was scientifically selected based on the fact that I only had five items in the first one.

    If it sounds too constrained, that’s because it is. I don’t have to think too much, if I can write it up in under five minutes, I add it. I don’t have to edit much, which I do with longer posts to cover more ground, and with delicious to pick the best link.

    There’s no incentive to rush it up. I usually post fast enough to get into TechMeme, but here it doesn’t matter how fast I write the post, only when I get to the fifth one. And I don’t know, so I don’t care.

    It’s also easier when I can add up or self correct in the next post.

    And so my question to you: Yay or nay?

    1. Sep 7th, 2006

      Thijs

      Yay

    2. Sep 7th, 2006

      ludo

      Yay!

    3. Sep 7th, 2006

      Marius Popescu

      Yayay

      I usually scroll quickly the delicious links. Your “5 links” posts seem more interesting.

    4. Sep 7th, 2006

      Brian Oberkirch

      I second the Yay. I like your annotations in additions to getting the link.

    5. Sep 7th, 2006

      Michael Campbell

      I enjoy them. I more into the “what” than the “when”, so if 5 takes 20 minutes to fill, or 2 weeks, fine with me.

      Yay.

    6. Sep 7th, 2006

      Sterling Camden

      Yay. I’m even considering changing the way I link blog as well.

    7. Sep 7th, 2006

      Tim Kersey

      Yay

    8. Sep 7th, 2006

      apotheon

      Yay.

      I find your essay-type posting more interesting, and provocative of more thought that might lead to some posts of my own. I also don’t really have the knack for lightblogging and never much have — I started SOB as a way to separate my heavier content from the lighter in another venue, but found that once I got SOB running I totally neglected the other.

      None of that means your lightblogging isn’t valuable: I get to skim over the material and pick out the bits that warrant further investigation, which I find handy. Just don’t let it get in the way of the more in-depth material.

    9. Sep 7th, 2006

      Paul Brown

      Yay. The middle ground between context-free del.icio.us scraping and longer essays is worthwhile reading.

    10. Sep 7th, 2006

      Assaf

      First, hi! Nice to meet you all.

      Sounds like we got ourself a winner.

      Apotheon, I’m going to keep the essays, as often as I can write them.

    11. Sep 8th, 2006

      Alex Barnett

      yup, it works.

    12. Sep 8th, 2006

      apotheon

      That’s all I can really ask, Assaf. Thanks.

    Your comment, here ⇓