1. Aug 4th, 2006

    Seven things you need to know about your next big startup idea

    VC funding is not a liquidation event. When you’re playing in an emerging market, the most you can do is speculate. VC rounds are hard numbers, but they’re not market intelligence, unless you’re price shopping for interest rate. Borrowing money is not the definition of success, it’s a sign that you’re not making a profit.

    Search is not broken. Search works great for most people most of the time. There’s a few places where search can improve, and you can round up the corners. But if you understand that it’s not broken, just has some untapped niche markets, you’ll be able to cost it better.

    There’s no bottomless pit of attention. We have not found a cure for sleep, and people still don’t have more spare time to divert more attention to more services. Attention is hard to find. And what TechCrunch gives this week, TechCrunch takes away next week when someone outdoes you with better gradients.

    All problems are interesting to solve. Some problems are also profitable to solve. It depends on how cheaply you can do it in the face of mounting competition. Yes, you can make a boatload of money dominating in the software industry, but even Microsoft’s ticket for success was bought for cheap. The Web is not different.

    Objects in the mirror look closer than they are. Craigslist, Evite and Yahoo Groups didn’t just happen, they took years to build up the audience. And it will take you years to build up your audience, and a smaller one if you’re trying to win users away.

    People are intelligently lazy. In VC pitches people have a tagging problem they can intelligently solve by being lazy and using your service. In real life, people have real problems and they’re intelligently lazy enough to ignore your service.

    All the good ideas are taken. Launching on TechCrunch a week ahead of your competitors is not being first to market. It’s being late to market by five years.

    And what about the fallacy of ads? I don’t believe in that. Ads are a source of revenue and you can make profit. Provided that limited attention spread over years is enough to make your non-interesting solution profitable after you pay back the debt. It’s the other variables of the equation you need to pay attention to.

    And last but not least, if you’re doing anything in the architecture of participation economy by leveraging user generated content to maximize the wisdom of crowd, maybe you should listen to the wisdom of crowd first. Read some blogs even if you don’t like what people have to say.

    1. Aug 5th, 2006

      Wangtam

      startup 中七点你需要知道的…

      在 Labnotes 上看见了 Assaf 的这一篇文章,分析得颇为理性,值得一看。我呢,就偷懒不做翻译了,全文转过来了,有兴趣的朋友可以翻译一下:……

    2. Aug 5th, 2006

      Seven things you need to know about your next big startup idea | emilykwan.com

      [...] From http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/08/04/seven-things-you-need-to-know-about-your-next-big-startup-idea/ [...]

    3. Aug 6th, 2006

      Gary Bourgeault (thealphamarketer.com)

      I especially like your comment, “All problems are interesting to solve. Some problems are also profitable to solve.”

      That’s really the difference in being successful in business or not. It’s knowing the difference between the two that determines the success of a business or idea.

      Even though it is so cheap to start Internet businesses up, it’s a lot harder to get them to make money for these very reasons.

    4. Aug 7th, 2006

      Assaf

      I think one point a lot of startups miss is that “cheap for me, is cheap for them”. In other words, you’re going to get more people copying your idea, and splitting up the market, that “cheaper” doesn’t cut it anymore.

      It has to be extremely efficient for the small target audience you can capture in the first few years.

      It goes hand in hand with the TechCrunch fallacy.

      Startups think that with zero marketing budget and one profile, they can reach 100% of the early adopter market. But with a hundred companies profiled in the same month, you really only get 1% attention. If even that.

    5. Sep 10th, 2006

      Chris Saad

      “There’s no bottomless pit of attention”

      I like that :)

    Your comment, here ⇓

    Or using OpenID