1. Mar 27th, 2006

    The pragmatic’s guide to Web architectures

    There’s a big battle of words raging on to define what the hell we’re doing and why we’re doing it all wrong.

    Are Web services on the Web, or do they have to use SOAP? How is low REST different from high REST? Does XML/HTTP work better if we call it POX? When is AJAX not AJAX? Who owns the semantic landscape?

    There are also a lot of people building applications, that don’t have time to argue how you call it or what it means, just as long as it works. We call them, “the pragmatics”. This post is for them.

    When it comes to designing Web services, there’s a few choices of architecture style, and stacks of technologies to choose from. It’s still undecided which one will rule them all, the race if far from over. Most people who write about that stuff hope their horse is the winning one.

    I’m no exception. So I’m going to play pundit and tell you which architecture style I think works best for the Web, which technology stack I prefer to use … Read the rest of the post here.

    Flexible Rails
    • Flex 3 and Ruby on Rails 2 integrated with HTTPService and XML
    • RESTful Rails controllers that support Flex and HTML clients
    • Coverage of how to use Cairngorm to architect larger Flex applications
    • A full application--not just a toy--developed and refactored iteratively

    Leave a Reply | Trackback | Track with co.mments

    Where's my comment? I get too much comment spam, so I have to moderate comments. Damn those spammers. If you don't see your comment immediately, be patient. I'll approve it the minute I see it. Want to know when your comment shows up, or check if anyone responded? Track it.

    Or using OpenID