Comments on: Stay on top of the conversation – co.mments.com http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/ Sun, 15 Jan 2012 21:29:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Assaf http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-7163 Assaf Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:38:58 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-7163 coconut, I'm working on just that feature. coconut, I’m working on just that feature.

]]> By: coconut http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-7162 coconut Fri, 21 Jul 2006 16:25:43 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-7162 It's coconut. Assaf, I suggest beoing able to receive updates via email. I got this idea from feedwhip.com, which tracks comments plus any change in websites. It’s coconut. Assaf, I suggest beoing able to receive updates via email. I got this idea from feedwhip.com, which tracks comments plus any change in websites.

]]> By: Betamode http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1469 Betamode Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:41:51 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1469 <strong>co.mments...</strong> Nach cocomments nun mit co.mments noch ein weiterer Player im Verfolge-deine-Kommentare-Feld: co.mments helps you stay on top of the conversation by keeping you updated of new comments. Just bookmark, track and follow. In einer Mail an meinen damaligen... co.mments…

Nach cocomments nun mit co.mments noch ein weiterer Player im Verfolge-deine-Kommentare-Feld:
co.mments helps you stay on top of the conversation by keeping you updated of new comments. Just bookmark, track and follow.
In einer Mail an meinen damaligen…

]]> By: Sterling Camden http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1375 Sterling Camden Wed, 08 Mar 2006 22:49:15 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1375 I like co.mments better than cocomment.com: http://www.chipstips.com/microblog/index.php/post/117/ I like co.mments better than cocomment.com: http://www.chipstips.com/microblog/index.php/post/117/

]]> By: co.mments, another comment tracker - JW http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1121 co.mments, another comment tracker - JW Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:36:28 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1121 [...] After coComment, another comment tracker launched: co.mments. Its goal is the same as coComment’s: bookmark a conversation you want to follow, and get all the new comments delivered on one page. However, this service has one feature coComment really misses: comment crawling. coComment only displays comments posted by other coComment users, while co.mments displays all comments. [...] [...] After coComment, another comment tracker launched: co.mments. Its goal is the same as coComment’s: bookmark a conversation you want to follow, and get all the new comments delivered on one page. However, this service has one feature coComment really misses: comment crawling. coComment only displays comments posted by other coComment users, while co.mments displays all comments. [...]

]]> By: Assaf http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1119 Assaf Sun, 19 Feb 2006 23:21:13 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1119 Jake, did you get my e-mail? I'm still working on developer docs, but I sent you a brief summary by e-mail. Jake, did you get my e-mail? I’m still working on developer docs, but I sent you a brief summary by e-mail.

]]> By: Jake http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1117 Jake Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:41:53 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1117 Ah, ok. Thanks - I figured when you pinged it, it would be an immediate update. Now, the next question - I create BlogFusion (www.blogfusion.com) and want to make sure my upcoming release works as well as it can with your functionality. Do you have developer specs somewhere? Ah, ok. Thanks – I figured when you pinged it, it would be an immediate update.

Now, the next question – I create BlogFusion (www.blogfusion.com) and want to make sure my upcoming release works as well as it can with your functionality. Do you have developer specs somewhere?

]]> By: Assaf http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1115 Assaf Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:08:55 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1115 it just popped out of the queue, so it looks like the queue size is about 10mins right now. there's a test post from: http://countersink.blogs.com/sink/2004/09/test.html also out of the queue with 6 comments. it just popped out of the queue, so it looks like the queue size is about 10mins right now. there’s a test post from:
http://countersink.blogs.com/sink/2004/09/test.html
also out of the queue with 6 comments.

]]> By: Assaf http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1114 Assaf Sun, 19 Feb 2006 08:04:14 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1114 it's still in the queue for updates. it’s still in the queue for updates.

]]> By: Jake http://labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/comment-page-1/#comment-1113 Jake Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:52:07 +0000 http://blog.labnotes.org/2006/02/13/stay-on-top-of-the-conversation-commentscom/#comment-1113 Nope, my comment above didn't push the tracking count - any idea why? Am I missing something? Nope, my comment above didn’t push the tracking count – any idea why? Am I missing something?

]]>